The case of VonHoldt v.Barba & Barba Construction, Inc.held that:
A) the implied warranty of habitability does not include actions against a builder brought by a subsequent purchaser for latent defects in an addition to a home.
B) the plaintiff's complaint should not have been dismissed by the lower court.
C) when a builder makes a significant addition to a previously built home, an action for damages resulting from latent defects affecting habitability exists under the doctrine of implied warranty of habitability.
D) All of these.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case held that when a builder makes a significant addition to a previously built home, an action for damages resulting from latent defects affecting habitability exists under the doctrine of implied warranty of habitability.

The Case of VonHoldt V