In the Giannetti V

In the Giannetti v. Cornillie case, the court found:

A) the modification of the mortgage amount, unlike the purchase price, was not a material term of the contract.
B) the modification of the mortgage amount was a material term, a counteroffer which rejected the original offer.
C) the doctrine of promissory estoppel required the court to grant plaintiff's motion for specific performance.
D) in order for an acceptance to create a binding contract, it need not strictly comply with the terms of the offer as long as the parties intended to form a contract.