In Robinson v. Durham , the court found:
A) the Robinsons were good faith purchasers for value when they bought the car for their business, and they had good title which they passed to Durham.
B) the Robinsons had a voidable title, and they passed good title to Durham, who was a good faith purchaser for value.
C) there was a breach of warranty of title between the Robinsons and Durham.
D) the Robinsons obtained no title from the thief, but they passed good title to Durham since he was a good faith purchaser for value.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: Goods must be both existing and identified
Q38: The parties, by agreement, may divide the
Q39: When goods have been damaged without the
Q40: In a contract where the buyer is
Q41: Tender requires that the seller, at a
Q43: In _ the goods are sold and
Q44: In a sale on approval:
A) possession, but
Q45: At common law, the risk of loss
Q46: With regard to Article 6 of the
Q47: Amanda ordered fifty personalized sweatshirts from King
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents