Larson & Son manufactured welders that frequently malfunctioned, setting clothing on fire and causing serious burns. Larson & Son sold all of its assets to Swenson Co., which continued to manufacture the Larson welder product line. Eleven months after Swenson's purchase, one of Larson's customers sued Swenson for injuries caused by a welder purchased from Larson, six months prior to the purchase by Swenson. Under the circumstances, Swenson Co.:
A) cannot be held liable, because it is a corporation.
B) cannot be held liable, because it did not manufacture the welder in question.
C) might be held liable in some states under strict liability.
D) could not be liable if Larson & Son still exists as a corporate entity.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: A dissenting shareholder who complies with all
Q37: The combination of two or more corporations
Q38: AB Corporation consolidates with ZX Corporation to
Q39: The right of dissent would exist in
Q40: Cash-out combinations are used to eliminate minority
Q42: Dissolution that is judicial may be brought
Q43: Which of the following is NOT a
Q44: If Sean, a shareholder who dissents to
Q45: Which of the following is untrue about
Q46: A consolidation:
A) has precisely the same result
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents