The court in Furlong v. Alpha Chi Omega Sorority held that:
A) the UCC did not apply to this situation.
B) the design specifications were part of the basis of the bargain and as such became an express warranty.
C) rejection of the goods was not rightful even though the sorority seasonably notified the seller within a reasonable time since notice was by phone.
D) the law required the sorority to accept Furlong's offer of compromise.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that the design specifications were part of the basis of the bargain, thus constituting an express warranty.

The Court in Furlong V