In 2013-14, the Indian Supreme Court ruled in Puttaswamy v Union of India that requiring a Unique Identification Number was unconstitutional if what?
A) It was restricted to residents of India.
B) It was necessary for proving citizenship.
C) It was required in order to obtain government services.
D) It was used to gather information to discriminate against minorities.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: SCENARIO - Please use the following to
Q21: Which of the following topics was NOT
Q22: SCENARIO - Please use the following to
Q23: SCENARIO - Please use the following to
Q24: How was the Supreme Court's ruling in
Q26: Hong Kong's New Guidance on Direct Marketing
Q27: SCENARIO - Please use the following to
Q28: Which of the following entities do NOT
Q29: SCENARIO - Please use the following to
Q30: All of the following are exempt from
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents