Justice Thurgood Marshall's dissenting opinion in the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke case concerning racial quotas in admissions argued that racial quotas were
A) necessary for helping to remedy the effects of the legacy of discrimination.
B) constitutional because they were protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
C) unconstitutional because the University of California is a public institution.
D) None of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q73: An opinion that agrees with the outcome
Q74: An opinion that disagrees with the winning
Q75: A high-ranking lawyer in the Justice Department
Q76: Which of the following is accurate concerning
Q77: Justice Clarence Thomas's dissenting opinion in the
Q79: The practice of interest groups arguing cases
Q80: Which of the following have a special
Q81: In 2013, the Democratic-controlled Senate altered the
Q82: In 2017, the Republican-controlled Senate altered the
Q83: The "blue slip process" can end a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents