The ratio of Pagett [1983] is which of the following:
A) That the act of taking V hostage was a necessary condition for her death (or a causa sine qua non) and thus Pagett was guilty of manslaughter?
B) That the police officers had broken the chain of causation because they had acted unreasonably and thus Pagett was not guilty of manslaughter.
C) That in order to constitute a novus actus interveniens, a third party intervention had to be voluntary, ie: free, deliberate and informed, e.g.: not a reasonable act in self-preservation or an act done in performance of a legal duty.
D) That causation is always a question of law.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A throws her baby on the floor
Q2: D hits V intending to harm her
Q3: A stranger hammers on your front door
Q4: The ratio of Stone & Dobinson is
Q5: V spent the weekend with D whom
Q6: The ratio of Airedale NHS Trust v
Q7: A defendant who commits a crime is
Q9: In medical cases, which of the following
Q10: D injures V's leg and a surgeon
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents