The court reasoned that the remaining ship should belong to Bombos because
A) The burnt ship had no parts in common with Bombos's original ship.
B) Bombos's original ship was identical to the remaining ship.
C) Both a and b
D) Neither a nor b

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court's reasoning likely involved both the fact that the burnt ship had no parts in common with Bombos's original ship (A), indicating a complete transformation or replacement of parts, and that Bombos's original ship was identical to the remaining ship (B), suggesting that the identity of the ship was preserved through the replacement of its parts.

The Court Reasoned That the Remaining Ship Should Belong to Bombos