What is a common critique of traditional research methods of testing significance, other than publication bias? Choose the best answer.
A) incorrect statistical techniques
B) misleading conclusion on presence of a null effect
C) misleading usage of a confidence interval
D) erroneous calculation of the point estimate

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Misleading conclusions on the presence of a null effect are a common critique of traditional research methods of testing significance. This is because significance testing often focuses on whether an effect exists or not, rather than on the size or importance of the effect, leading to potential misinterpretation of null results as evidence of no effect, rather than as inconclusive evidence.

What Is a Common Critique of Traditional Research Methods of Testing