Which of the following cases held that held that pat-down searches of male inmates does not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Grummett v. Rushen held that pat-down searches of male inmates by female guards do not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. This case addressed the balance between the need for prison security and the protection of individual constitutional rights.

Which of the Following Cases Held That Held That Pat-Down