Frankfurt denies that the principle of alternate possibilities implies that moral responsibility is incompatible with determinism.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Frankfurt argues against the principle of alternate possibilities (PAP), which states that a person is morally responsible for what they have done only if they could have done otherwise. He uses thought experiments, such as the Frankfurt cases, to show that moral responsibility does not necessarily depend on the ability to do otherwise, thus challenging the idea that determinism and moral responsibility are incompatible.

Frankfurt Denies That the Principle of Alternate Possibilities Implies That