Tommie,a six-year-old child,was seriously injured when he stuck a fork into an electrical outlet.His parents sued the restaurant where the incident occurred,claiming it should have had child protective guards on the outlets.Whether the restaurant is liable will be dependent upon whether:
A) the incident was reasonably foreseeable.
B) the parents exercised enough supervision of their child.
C) this is negligence per se.
D) this is an ultrahazardous activity.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: Res ipsa loquitur shifts the burden of
Q18: Courts have ruled that negligently retaining a
Q19: In most states dram acts apply to:
A)
Q23: Bob,a weak swimmer,ignored warning signs in a
Q24: A customer in a restaurant would be
Q25: Which of the following statements regarding a
Q27: Under a state law,a dog owner is
Q29: In a comparative negligence state,if the plaintiff
Q35: Wayne worked in an office.He had no
Q39: A plaintiff sues in negligence but has
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents