When considering the history of the hearsay rule:
A) it is apparent that the rule has not changed during the past 20 years.
B) judges and court rule makers have recognized that the exceptions to the rule had to be recognized because of the harshness of a rule that prohibits the use of all hearsay evidence.
C) it is obvious that today, as in the fourteenth century, jurors are chosen because they have some knowledge of the case.
D) one learns that the hearsay rule was formulated strictly for use in this country.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: In the case of Davis v. State,
Q19: In the case of State v. Washington,
Q20: One of the reasons for the general
Q21: "A statement, other than one made by
Q22: The hearsay rule:
A) has no exceptions, because
Q24: There are four general reasons that support
Q25: The reasons for the hearsay rule in
Q26: A statement relating to a startling event
Q27: Joe Shar Bell came out of his
Q28: Sometimes business and public records are admissible
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents