An accused has a federal constitutional right under the Sixth Amendment to confront and cross-examine the witnesses who testify against the accused at a criminal trial. When the defendant's criminal act proves to be the reason a particular witness cannot be present to testify against the accused and hearsay evidence from the witness is sought to be introduced:
A) a defendant may always assert his or her rights under the Sixth Amendment and prevent that witness's hearsay evidence from being used against that defendant.
B) a defendant can prevent the hearsay evidence from being introduced in court because the out-of-court witness was not under oath at the time of the statement.
C) the evidence is always admissible against a defendant as long as there were several witnesses to corroborate what the witness said out of court.
D) the defendant may not be able to successfully exclude the hearsay evidence because the defendant, by his or her act of injuring or killing the witness, has caused the unavailability of the witness and has forfeited the right to complain about the alleged Sixth Amendment violation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: There is an exception to the hearsay
Q30: Testimony of a witness given at a
Q31: Under Federal Rule 804, former testimony of
Q32: In a prosecution in a criminal case,
Q33: A dying declaration is a statement by
Q35: A dying declaration, in order to be
Q36: A declaration against the interests of the
Q37: When a police officer takes the stand
Q38: In some instances, evidence is offered not
Q39: In the case of Bell v. State,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents