Although the case dealt with the burden of proof in a juvenile case where the act charged would have been a crime if committed by an adult, the case of In re Winship held that in either an adult or juvenile case in which the act would have been a crime if committed by the adult, the Constitution of United States and historical practice dictated that the standard of proof beyond a reasonable time was a constitutional requirement. How did to the Court arrive at this conclusion? Explain.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Although the case dealt with the burden of proof in a juvenile case where the act charged would have been a crime if committed by an adult, the case of In re Winship held that in either an adult or juvenile case in which the act would have been a crime if committed by the adult, the Constitution of United States and historical practice dictated that the standard of proof beyond a reasonable time was a constitutional requirement. How did to the Court arrive at this conclusion? Explain.

Although the Case Dealt with the Burden of Proof in a Juvenile