Liebman et al.'s (2000) study regarding death sentence reversals found that one of the most common reasons for reversal was the result of __________ of evidence that the defendant is innocent or does not deserve the death penalty.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Liebman et al.'s study found that prosecutorial suppression of evidence that supports the defendant's innocence or suggests that they do not deserve the death penalty was one of the most common reasons for death sentence reversals. The other options listed (lack of effective counsel, attorney/client privilege, and juries not following instructions) were not identified as the most common reasons for reversal in this study.

Liebman Et Al