A researcher was studying how the weights of horseshoe crabs along the East Coast vary between northern and southern habitats. In spring 2006, during breeding season, the researcher randomly selected 50 horseshoe crabs in southern habitats. In fall 2006, before the breeding season began, the researcher randomly selected 50 horseshoe crabs from northern habitats. It was found that crabs in southern habitats weighed more, so the researcher claimed that location had an effect on the weight of horseshoe crabs. Why should the results of this study not be trusted?
A) The study was not double-blind.
B) The investigator was biased. She knew beforehand what the study would show.
C) The investigator should have used more than two locations.
D) The time of year during which the samples were taken is a confounding variable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Ability to grow in shade may help
Q8: Ability to grow in shade may help
Q9: Ability to grow in shade may help
Q10: Which of the following is NOT a
Q11: Which term applies to any experimental condition
Q13: Does fibrolytic enzyme level in feedlot cattle
Q14: The drug valproate has been shown in
Q15: What does it mean when two variables
Q16: The Physicians' Health Study followed 22,000 male
Q17: The Physicians' Health Study followed 22,000 male
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents