In Arcos Ltd v EA Ronaasen & Son a contract was held not discharged because the timber supplied was 1/8 of an inch thicker than agreed, despite being usable for its intended purpose.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Does the House of Lords decision in
Q19: The test set out in Hadley
Q20: In which case was a party not
Q21: The rule on the remoteness of loss
Q22: In Re Moore & Co and Landauer
Q24: Generally, a party who has failed to
Q25: A severable contract is useful because it
Q26: A repudiatory breach of a contract will
Q27: Terms implied by the Sale of Goods
Q28: In Schuler v Wickman the House
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents