When considering a changing world, both Christian and Islamic scholars wrestled with the question of everyday changes. Although secondary causation worked for most European philosophers, Islamic thinkers rejected it because:
A) It developed directly from the Christian Bible.
B) It gave too much power to God and no credit to human types of change.
C) It took some power and omnipotence away from God making God less active.
D) None of these.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: In terms of understanding the workings of
Q5: In terms of understanding the workings of
Q6: Historians say the Europe gave rise to
Q7: The author notes that a unique feature
Q8: Suppose we see a bowling ball hit
Q10: The idea of secondary causation explains change
Q11: Although not favored by Islamic thinkers, the
Q12: Sigmund Freud called this work the first
Q13: As a result of the scientific revolution,
Q14: The mechanized world view led scientists to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents