The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Jerry Falwell in his privacy/emotional distress claim against Hustler magazine for which of the following reasons?
A) when people die their privacy rights die with them; those rights cannot be claimed by family members or anyone else
B) the rights to benefit from a person's image or likeness can be passed down to others, but not of that person did not gain economically from his or her likeness while alive
C) the 7-year "statute of limitations" on privacy claims had expired
D) the state in which Falwell lived (Virginia) did not have any laws concerning appropriation
E) the magazine item involved was ruled a "parody" and was unlikely to be taken seriously
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: An exception to appropriation law that allows
Q9: When the court ruled against Abigail Roberson
Q10: In the "private facts" cases of Sidis
Q11: Which of the following is NOT considered
Q12: Which of the following is an example
Q14: In the cases of Cantrell v. Forest
Q15: In the appropriation case of Midler v.
Q16: In the privacy/false light suit of Time
Q17: Common law provides four appropriation defenses journalists
Q18: In the private facts cases of Cox
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents