Suppose the following situation: The local city Council decides to consider legislation prohibiting various kinds of harassment. One part of the proposed ordinance borrows language from the student code of a nearby college.
Criminal penalties will be imposed for "conduct likely to constitute harassment ... including but not limited to exhibiting, distributing, posting, or advertising publicly offensive, indecent, or abusive matter concerning any person or group of persons in the [City of Happyvale]; [and] employing racial, sexual, ethnic, sexual orientation, religious, or personal slurs or epithets....."
Write an essay assessing the constitutionality of this part of the ordinance from the perspective of each justice's opinion listed below.
Justice Sanford, in Gitlow v. New York.
Justice Brandeis, in Whitney v. California
Justice Frankfurter, in Dennis v. United States
Justice Brennan, in Texas v. Johnson
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q15: In New York Times v. United States
Q16: Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate
Q17: Janus v. AFSCME (2018) involved
A) right to
Q18: The Sedition Act of 1798 was declared
Q19: Dennis v. United States, decided in 1952,
Q21: In what respects do Gitlow v. New
Q22: During recent decades in several cases involving
Q23: Consider Chief Justice Vinson's plurality opinion in
Q24: Consider Good News Club v. Milford Central
Q25: Why are prior restraints deemed more harmful
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents