In U.S. v. Haggar Apparel Company, the Supreme Court held that:
A) Section 9802 of the HTS is unconstitutional
B) If the Customs Service makes a reasonable interpretation and implementation of an ambiguous statutory provision, it must be given judicial deference
C) Customs regulations are not entitled to judicial deference because the Court of International Trade is charged to "'reach the correct decision'" in determining the proper classification of goods
D) The Court of International Trade is not required to apply the legal framework from Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q88: A binding ruling by the Customs Service
Q89: Duties assessed on the value of a
Q90: When an importer's goods do not fit
Q91: Section 9802 of the HTS provides for:
A)
Q92: The court that has jurisdiction over any
Q94: The customs valuation of imported goods is
Q95: The country of origin of an imported
Q96: Country of origin provides the customs service
Q97: Deductive value is one method of determining
Q98: A form of tax relief in which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents