In case of a tort claim of emotional distress, the plaintiff could:
A) win for having been insulted by bad language
B) win only if some physical injury is proven to accompany the mental injury
C) win only if "outward manifestations" of mental injury are apparent
D) win for distress over injuries suffered by victims of war in other countries
E) none of the other choices

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In tort law, simply being insulted by bad language (A) does not typically constitute a basis for a claim of emotional distress. While physical injury can strengthen a claim (B), it is not always a necessary component for all types of emotional distress claims, depending on jurisdiction. "Outward manifestations" of mental injury (C) may support a claim but are not universally required. Distress over injuries suffered by victims of war in other countries (D) would generally not be a direct cause of action for an individual in a tort claim of emotional distress, as it lacks the direct personal impact or involvement typically required. Therefore, none of the provided options accurately describe the conditions under which a plaintiff could win a tort claim of emotional distress without more specific context or qualifications.

In Case of a Tort Claim of Emotional Distress, the Plaintiff