InOrkal Industries v. Array Connector, where Orkal bought parts from Array by sending an order form, but Array confirmed with its own form that contained different terms. Orkal did not object to the different terms until litigation arose later at which point the added terms mattered. The courts held that under the UCC:
A) the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, so the original order form controls
B) the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, so the original order form controls;Array could have forced a change by requiring Orkal to recognize its different terms, but it failed to do so
C) the seller, Array, controlled because Orkal did not object to the change in terms when the contract was formed
D) the seller, Array, controlled because under UCC 2-207, a sellers terms always control
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q199: If the parties to a sale under
Q200: If a good has been stolen and
Q201: Under the common law, an offer can
Q202: A buyer and a seller would like
Q203: Under Article 2 of the UCC a
Q205: Lisa mailed an offer to sell cotton
Q206: Under UCC Article 2, terms regarding payment,
Q207: Under the common law, an offer can
Q208: Under Article 2 of the UCC, a
Q209: A buyer and seller have been doing
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents