In Orkal Industries v. Array Connector, where Orkal bought parts from Array by sending an order form, but Array confirmed with its own form that contained different terms. Orkal did not object to the different terms until litigation arose later at which point the added terms mattered. The courts held that under the UCC:
A) the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, sos the original order form controls
B) the buyer, Orkal, controlled the terms, so the original order form controls; Array could have forced a change by requiring Orkal to recognize its different terms, but it failed to do so
C) the seller, Array, controlled because Orka di not object to the change in terms when the contract was formed
D) the seller, Array, controlled because under UCC 2-207, a sellers terms always control
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q231: To satisfy the Statute of Frauds under
Q232: Under the common law, contract modifications must
Q233: With respect to parol evidence and the
Q234: Suppose two parties to a contract that
Q235: Balls, Inc. sells all baseballs needed by
Q237: Under UCC Article 2, when there is
Q238: With respect to parol evidence and the
Q239: Balls, Inc. sells all baseballs needed by
Q240: Andrea offered to buy apricots from Aramos.
Q241: If parties to a contract involving a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents