In the Beck case, where non-union workers at AT&T were required by a union to pay "agency fees," instead of union dues, to contribute to the expense of representing these workers in collective bargaining. The Supreme Court held that the union:
A) violated the First Amendment rights of non-union workers
B) violated the Taft-Hartley Act
C) acted legally because Congress had ruled courts may not place restrictions on union dues
D) impermissibly interfered with interstate commerce
E) had improperly spent agency fees on political action
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q470: The Supreme Court has held in several
Q471: State right-to-work laws are allowed by:
A) the
Q472: Union certification is granted by the NLRB
Q473: In Chicago Teachers Union, regarding agency fees
Q474: The result of the decision from the
Q476: Certification of a union by the NLRB
Q477: In the Beck case, where non-union workers
Q478: In non-right-to-work states, employees at unionized workplaces
Q479: If over half of the employees at
Q480: In non-right-to-work states, employees at unionized workplaces
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents