In City of Livonia Employees Retirement System v. Boeing Co., City sued Boeing on behalf of all persons who bought Boeing stock in a certain time period on the basis that the company was overly optimistic about the time schedule for the new 787 aircraft. When problems with the plane developed, the stock fell ten percent. Suit claimed that company executives made false statements about the plane, so committed securities fraud. The appeals court held that Boeing was:
A) liable for securities fraud because the reports about the plane were not sufficiently identified as a forward-looking statement
B) not liable for securities fraud because the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act requires that plaintiffs "demonstrate fraud" in company statements, which did not happen
C) Not liable for securities fraud because there is no evidence Boeing knew of the problems in advance
D) American Express was liable for all damages due to its overly optimistic statements
E) American Express was liable for securities fraud because it did not have a separate section of the report that identified it as a forward looking statement
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q347: The _, which was established by the
Q348: The Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:
A)
Q349: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires large companies with
Q350: Under the _, securities suits involving nationally
Q351: The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of
Q353: The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of
Q354: In City of Livonia Employees Retirement System
Q355: The _ requires that the Chief Executive
Q356: Under the _, securities suits involving nationally
Q357: The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents