In the Brooke Group case the Supreme Court held that firms should enforce the Robinson-Patman act by suing competitors who slash prices too low.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In the Brooke Group case, the Supreme Court did not hold that firms should enforce the Robinson-Patman Act by suing competitors who slash prices too low. In fact, the court held that it is not a violation of the Act for a competitor to engage in aggressive price competition even if it results in below-cost pricing, as long as there is no anti-competitive intent or effect.

In the Brooke Group Case the Supreme Court Held That