In the Mapp V

In the Mapp v. Ohio decision, the Supreme Court ruled that

A) an accused individual must be informed of her or his rights before a police interrogation.
B) the protections against self-incrimination may be waived in particularly heinous crimes.
C) the right to habeas corpus can be suspended for certain individuals under certain conditions.
D) to produce evidence acceptable in court, a search must be conducted in accordance with certain standards.
E) juveniles are afforded the same rights as adults in the criminal process.