In Lewis v. Moore, the court ruled
A) Since Moore was a sole-proprietorship she could not close down the business without a majority vote of the employees.
B) Moore could not close down the business if it would be detrimental the employees.
C) Since Moore was a sole proprietor she was free to dissolve it at any time.
D) Moore needed to have shareholder approval before dissolving the business.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Since Moore was a sole proprietor, she had complete control over the business, including the decision to dissolve it without needing approval from employees, shareholders, or any other parties. Sole proprietorships are owned and operated by one individual, granting them full authority over business decisions.

In Lewis V. Moore, the Court Ruled