In the Case Sauer V

In the case Sauer v. Lawson, the court ruled

A) Fraud may be inferred by actual conduct rather than a need to have specific intent.
B) Actual fraud can only be proven if malice aforethought is shown in the transactions.
C) Fraud may be inferred by actual conduct rather and need to have a specific intent.
D) Actual fraud includes conduct that is intended to hinder creditors.