In James V

In James v. Ford Motor Credit, the court ruled

A) A repo agent cannot remove a good if the debtor objects to it.
B) The fact that the repo agent removed the car from a public area and exercised control over the car for over an hour meant that the repossession did not breach the peace.
C) A debtor has a right of self-help at any time if he believes his good has been wrongfully possessed.
D) Ford Motor Credit cannot delegate the responsibility to a third party, including the repo agent.