The U.S. Supreme Court the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) as it applied to the states, finding that the Act went beyond the constitutional authority of Congress to regulate state policy-making in matters affecting religious exercise.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case City of Boerne v. Flores (1997), held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) as it applied to the states exceeded Congress's authority under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, thus ruling it unconstitutional insofar as it applied to the states. This decision was based on the principle that Congress had overstepped its bounds in attempting to dictate how states regulate matters affecting religious exercise.

The US Supreme Court the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) as as It