John Searle's "Chinese Room Objection"draws the conclusion that
A) our language affects how we perceive the world.
B) people's brain states change when they speak different languages.
C) there are no grounds to suppose that artificial intelligence programs can understand or perform mental acts.
D) by definition, if a person can duplicate the input and output of a Chinese speaker, then that person understands Chinese.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: The Chinese Room thought experiment is used
Q8: By "multiple realizability"the functionalist means
A) mental events
Q9: The functionalist differs from the metaphysical behaviorist
Q10: The functionalist differs from the reductive materialist
Q11: The inverted spectrum argument makes the point
Q13: A key feature of the Chinese Room
Q14: How does functionalism differ from metaphysical behaviorism?
Q15: How does functionalism differ from reductive materialism?
Q16: What is the inverted-spectrum argument? What relevance
Q17: What is Searle's Chinese Room thought experiment?
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents