The Daubert decision affected the admission of social science evidence in court cases by
A) raising the question of when scientific evidence resulting from social science techniques should be considered valid and leading to the establishment of the criteria for social science validity.
B) disregarding testimonies of "experts" as mere opinions and nothing more.
C) increasing the number of mentally ill defendants who escaped incarceration and instead were placed in mental institutions.
D) elevating the opinions of experts and solely basing trial outcomes on them.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Developed in the 1990's, " therapeutic jurisprudence"
A)
Q6: In a social framework testimony
A) an expert
Q7: Social scientists can influence policy by
A) working
Q8: To bring research to the attention of
Q9: In order for expert testimony to be
Q11: Dr. Johnson indicates in his testimony that
Q12: Is it fair for the court to
Q13: It is apparent that psychologists view human
Q14: Psychology is not value free, or in
Q15: What is meant by internal and external
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents