What are Conant's ideological and political-economic justifications for the system of tracking, or ability grouping? Are these justifications consistent with what John Dewey called the "moral meaning" of democracy, namely, that all social institutions should contribute to the "all-around growth of every member of society"? Defend your view.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Conant's ideological and political-economic justifications for the system of tracking, or ability grouping, are based on the belief that it allows for the most efficient allocation of resources and the maximization of individual potential. In his view, tracking allows for students to be placed in classes that align with their abilities, which can lead to better educational outcomes for all students. Additionally, Conant argues that tracking can help to identify and nurture students with exceptional talents, ultimately benefiting society as a whole.

However, these justifications are not consistent with John Dewey's "moral meaning" of democracy, which emphasizes the all-around growth of every member of society. Dewey believed that all social institutions, including education, should strive to promote the development of each individual in a holistic manner, rather than sorting them based on perceived abilities.

From this perspective, Conant's system of tracking could be seen as contradictory to the principles of democracy, as it may perpetuate inequality and limit the opportunities for certain groups of students. Instead of fostering the all-around growth of every member of society, tracking could potentially reinforce existing social divisions and hinder the development of students who are not placed in the highest tracks.

In conclusion, while Conant's justifications for tracking may have practical and economic reasoning, they do not align with the moral meaning of democracy as proposed by John Dewey. The focus on individual abilities over the holistic development of all students could contribute to a less equitable and inclusive educational system, ultimately undermining the principles of democracy.

What Are Conant's Ideological and Political-Economic Justifications for the System