In United States v. Conte, a court of appeals held that the state ________ at a probation revocation proceeding on the grounds that it was not a criminal case.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In United States v. Conte, the court of appeals held that the state could compel an individual to testify at a probation revocation proceeding because it is not considered a criminal case, thus not providing the same protections against self-incrimination as in a criminal trial.

In United States V