The United State Supreme Court in Davis v. Washington, 2006 decided:
A) that a 911 dispatcher could testify to what a 911 caller told them even if they identified the suspect.
B) that a 911 dispatcher testimony of what a 911 caller told them would be considered hearsay.
C) that 911 dispatchers could not testify because they could not positively identify a caller.
D) that a 911 dispatcher could testify to what a 911 caller told them but they could not identify the suspect.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: The attempt to limit or discredit evidence
Q15: Hearsay is inadmissible unless:
A) an exception is
Q16: A trial judge has the authority (discretion)
Q17: Which of the following is NOT one
Q18: Which of the following is NOT an
Q20: Preliminary questions concerning the qualification of a
Q21: A trial judge has the discretion to
Q22: Hearsay is never admissible in a criminal
Q23: Former testimony is not considered as hearsay.
Q24: The fairness rule requires the exclusion of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents