Nevada passed a law banning all commercial billboards along state highways to rid the state highways of billboards,which are offensive to citizens.If this law were to be challenged,which of the following would a court examine to determine if the law is constitutional?
A) It would have to be established that the law furthers an interest of the state of Nevada to create a more aesthetically pleasing environment.
B) It would have to be shown that the law directly and materially advances the state's goal of a more aesthetically pleasing environment.
C) It would have to be shown that the law reaches no further than necessary to promote the state goal.
D) All of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: The doctrine of preemption is based on
Q25: Ikerd was entering the United States from
Q27: When Congress passed a criminal statute called
Q30: Every year the U.S.Supreme Court receives about
Q32: A woman wishes to attend an all-male,publicly
Q35: Generally,constitutional protections do NOT apply to
A)acts of
Q36: O'Neil raised 80 acres of corn,most of
Q37: If there is a conflict between federal
Q38: The states may not enact laws that
Q40: Which of the following limitations does not
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents