In the case Donovan v.RRL Corporation,the Supreme Court of California held that the car dealer's price mistake:
A)did not entitle the dealer to recind the contract as the mistake was unilateral.
B)did not entitle the dealer to rescind the contract as it was on the value.
C)entitled the dealer to rescind as it was a material mistake made by the newspaper.
D)was not sufficiently severe to render the bargain unfair.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court of California held that the dealer was entitled to rescind the contract because the mistake was material and made by the newspaper, which was beyond the dealer's control.

In the Case Donovan V