In the case Rosenberg v.Son,Inc.,the Supreme Court of North Dakota held that Pratt was still liable to Rosenberg as she did not obtain a novation by assigning her rights to Son,Inc.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement accurately reflects the holding of the Supreme Court of North Dakota in the case Rosenberg v. Son, Inc. In that case, the court held that the defendant, Pratt, remained liable to the plaintiff, Rosenberg, even though Pratt assigned her rights in the contract to Son, Inc. The court found that there was no novation - or agreement to release Pratt from liability - between Rosenberg and Son, Inc.

In the Case Rosenberg V