Michael was a director of Dot.com Tomorrow Inc, incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act.He was charged with failing to ensure that the corporation maintained adequate safety standards for its workers.He was furious, claiming that he was innocent.Michael hired the most expensive lawyer he could find and rented a limousine with driver to take him to the court every day of the three-week trial.Each night of the trial, he dined out at the best restaurant in town.Eventually, he was acquitted and has asked the corporation to indemnify him for all these expenses.Which of the following is FALSE regarding the legal obligation of the corporation to indemnify Michael for these expenses?
A) Dot.com may be obliged to indemnify Michael because he was substantially successful on the merits of his defence.
B) Dot.com can only indemnify for reasonable expenses and, to the extent that Michael's expenses are not reasonable, they cannot be indemnified.
C) Dot.com may be obliged to indemnify because Michael had reasonable grounds for believing his conduct was lawful.
D) So long as Michael fulfilled his fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the corporation, Dot.com may be obliged to indemnify him for reasonable expenses.
E) Dot.com has to pay for everything but the limousine.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: Manuel was the Alberta sales manager employed
Q46: Denise has been asked to join the
Q47: The obligation that requires certain people within
Q48: Padraig is a director of Eire Inc.Oona,
Q49: The defence of due diligence
A)applies only to
Q51: Prophet Inc has existed for several years.Delilah
Q52: As a result of dealing with Barry,
Q53: Robyn and his eight friends bought shares
Q54: Roxanne is a minority shareholder in Sumner
Q55: Frank and Emma are shareholders in a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents