As Discussed in Case Brief 24

As discussed in Case Brief 24.2, the dispute involving lululemon athletica

A) eventually led Parliament to enact the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act to protect consumers from rapacious businesses.
B) was the first case in which a company was successfully prosecuted under the Competition Act.
C) was widely reported as a victory for unscrupulous companies because it allowed the company to avoid liability by simply moving its manufacturing plant outside of Canada.
D) arose from a misleading advertising campaign.
E) resulted in a Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally reformulated the defence of due diligence.