Why did the court find that the contract was frustrated in the case of: Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740?
A)Due to the declaration of war and the consequent impossibility of performing the contract.
B)Due to the complete destruction of the subject matter of the contract.
C)Due to the non-occurrence of an event essential to achieve the substantial purpose of the contract.
D)Due to the fundamental and radical change in the circumstances of the contract.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The contract was for the hire of a flat to view the coronation procession of King Edward VII. However, the procession did not take place due to the King's illness. The court found that the non-occurrence of the event (the procession) was essential to achieve the substantial purpose of the contract, therefore frustrating it.

Why Did the Court Find That the Contract Was Frustrated