Why was the conduct found to be misleading and deceptive in Pacific Dunlop v Hogan (1989)23 FCR 553?
A)The use of the name might cause confusion in the minds of some consumers.
B)The conduct created the false impression that a commercial relationship existed between the parties.
C)The conduct was not found to be misleading and deceptive.
D)The misconception was caused by use of an existing name which already had a well-established reputation.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The conduct was found to be misleading and deceptive because it created the false impression that a commercial relationship existed between the parties. This implied that Hogan was authorized by Pacific Dunlop to sell the product, which was not the case.

Why Was the Conduct Found to Be Misleading and Deceptive