What was the reason for the decision in Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191?
A) The target audience of the conduct would not be misled into thinking there was a connection between the two products.
B) A purchaser could be misled if someone removed the labels without the manufacturer's knowledge.
C) The products were clearly labelled so there was nothing more the manufacturer could do.
D) The conduct could cause consumers to wonder if the products were made by the same manufacturer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: You have booked a holiday home through
Q2: Which of the following is NOT one
Q3: In relation to 'conduct' under s 18
Q4: How does s18 of the Australian Consumer
Q5: In order to establish misleading and deceptive
Q7: In relation to 'conduct' under s 18
Q8: The onus of proving that a transaction
Q9: Under the Australian Consumer Law definition,a 'consumer'
Q10: In relation to 'conduct' under s 18
Q11: In which case did the court set
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents