In Strong v Woolworths [2012} HCA 5,the High Court found that:
A) the damage caused to the plaintiff was outside the scope of Woolworths' liability.
B) the failure of Woolworths to adopt a reasonable system of cleaning was the effective cause of the plaintiff's fall.
C) the plaintiff contributed to her injury by not looking where she was going.
D) the injury to the plaintiff was not caused by Woolworths' negligence.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: What is the name of the test
Q31: A participant in a sport or recreational
Q32: Tort law defines the 'reasonable person' as:
A)the
Q33: If the defence of voluntary assumption of
Q34: The test to determine the standard of
Q36: Which of the following is NOT a
Q37: Who is the reasonable person and why
Q38: The plaintiff in Bolton v Stone [1951]
Q39: The case of Imbree v McNeilly [2008]
Q40: In Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents