Why did the decision in Banque Brussels Lambert SA v ANI Ltd (1989) 21 NSWLR 502 differ from the decision in Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysian Mining Corporation [1988] 1 WLR 799?
A) Kleinwort Benson was an English case.
B) The words used in the Banque Brussels case were promissory in nature.
C) The Banque Brussels case involved a subsidiary.
D) The Kleinwort Benson case involved a subsidiary.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: In which type of agreement is the
Q4: In determining whether the parties to an
Q5: A 'rebuttable' presumption is:
A)one which can be
Q6: Which of the following would best describe
Q7: When a business advertises their product,the courts
Q9: The case of Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox
Q10: In which of the following cases did
Q11: A subjective test is used to determine
Q12: By including the wording 'this agreement is
Q13: What is the courts' rationale for presuming
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents