The decision in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1998) 164 CLR 387 is significant because:
A) promissory estoppel was applied where there was no pre-existing contract.
B) promissory estoppel was used to commence an action.
C) promissory estoppel was applied in Australia.
D) all of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q32: The plaintiff in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co
Q33: Why is consideration important in respect to
Q34: Explain what is meant by the expression
Q35: Which of the following is NOT an
Q36: When the doctrine of promissory estoppel is
Q37: Which of the following would NOT amount
Q38: Consideration must have a value that is
Q39: The doctrine of promissory estoppel:
A)can be used
Q41: To what extent has the doctrine of
Q42: Identify the following items numbered as 1
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents